Soft Fair-Use vs Analytics Dashboard Lockouts
Disclosure: We build Antlytics. This post explains our published fair-use policy and the general lockout vs soft-limit trade-off. Competitor over-limit behaviour changes — always verify on their site before you switch.
You hit a traffic spike. That should be a good week.
For some analytics tools, it is also the week the dashboard locks until you upgrade — exactly when you most need to see referrers, landing pages, and goals.
That gap — trust economics — is why soft fair-use matters.
Three ways vendors handle overages
| Model | What you feel | When it hurts |
|---|---|---|
| Dashboard lockout | Data disappears until you pay | Viral week, launch week, bot spike |
| Metered overages | Surprise bill or anxiety about every pageview | Same spike — success becomes a cost event |
| Soft fair-use | Email at ~80% and 100%; dashboard stays open | Only if traffic stays far above the plan long-term |
We wrote a longer pricing-philosophy piece here: Fair use vs metered analytics pricing. This post focuses on the lockout problem specifically.
What Antlytics does (documented)
From our usage & fair use docs:
- Starter: 500,000 pageviews/month across all sites
- Pro: 2,000,000 pageviews/month
- At ~80% and 100%: email alerts (once each per calendar month)
- No lockout — dashboard keeps working
- No metered overage charges
- No data loss — events past the allowance are still ingested
If traffic has genuinely outgrown the plan, the upgrade conversation happens by email — not by switch-off. Sustained extreme overuse may be throttled to protect the service, but that starts with a human conversation.
Clear limits. No secrets.
Why lockouts feel worse than the bill
A lockout is not just “please upgrade.” It hides the story of the spike:
- Which referrer drove it?
- Which page held attention?
- Did any goal convert?
You learn that after you complete a billing flow you did not plan for. Soft fair-use keeps the story visible while you decide whether to upgrade.
Bot traffic makes this sharper. If bots inflate pageviews toward a hard gate, a lockout can feel like a scam upgrade. Antlytics filters bots at ingest and offers per-site shield rules; fair-use still assumes honest spikes happen — and should not brick your dashboard.
Comparing to other privacy tools
Plausible and peers — Many privacy-friendly tools use pageview tiers. Some restrict access or features when you exceed a prepaid allowance; others meter or ask you to upgrade. We do not claim a specific competitor’s current lockout policy in this post — those pages change. Check their billing docs. For a product fact table (sites, fair-use, MCP), see Antlytics vs Plausible.
Self-host (Umami, Plausible CE) — No vendor lockout, but you own the ops. Hardware and ops cost replace the SaaS overage conversation.
Antlytics — Hosted, unlimited sites on Starter from US$9/month, soft fair-use, MCP for Cursor/Claude. Trade-off: newer product; no self-host edition.
When soft fair-use is the right fit
Choose soft fair-use if you:
- Run launches, newsletters, or HN/Reddit posts that create short spikes
- Manage several sites under one bill and hate per-site punishment
- Want predictable USD pricing without dashboard hostage situations
Choose something else if you need hard contractual caps, EU-only residency, or full self-host control.
FAQ
Does Antlytics lock the dashboard if I exceed pageviews? No. See usage & fair use.
What is soft fair-use? Generous allowance + email alerts + no automatic lockout or metered overages. Upgrade is a conversation when growth is sustained.
How do I verify a competitor? Open their pricing and billing docs and search for overage, lock, or exceed. Do not rely on a third-party blog (including this one) for their current enforcement.
Related: Fair use vs metered pricing · Antlytics vs Plausible · Multi-site without overpaying · Usage docs